SimplyVital Health, Inc. – a healthcare- based blockchain firm – has settled with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over an allegedly unregistered $6.3 million initial coin offering (ICO).
According to SEC, the New England-based SimplyVital Health, Inc. planned to create a healthcare-related blockchain ecosystem, dubbed Health Nexus. The firm publicly announced plans to build its platform through the sale of its Health Cash (HLTH) token in 2017. Based on the charges brought by SEC, the commission alleges that the company raised more than $6 million through a pre-sale of its token.
Notably, the pre-sale was offered under a simple agreement for future tokens (SAFTs) arrangement – a model which is designed to simplify the ICO process and reduce the risk of enforcement actions by offering investment contracts rather than tokens. Following the pre-sale, which closed in April 2018, the firm did not move forward with the planned public offering.
Respectively, SimplyVital made use of the SAFT arrangement that stipulated tokens would not be dispersed to investors until SimplyVital created its platform. However, following the pre-sale, which closed in April 2018, the firm did not move forward with the planned public offering.
Subsequently, SEC concluded that the blockchain healthcare company had violated provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and “did not file a registration statement with the Commission or qualify for an exemption from registration before offering and selling HLTH to the public through the SAFTs.”
Following this, SimplyVital, whilst neither admitting nor denying the SEC’s charges, has agreed to comply with SEC’s cease and desist order and will face no further penalty, as the firm had already returned to investors “substantially all of the funds raised during its pre-sale” by April 19th 2019.
According to industry sources, many had reported in 2018 that the SEC was most likely going after SAFT sales. An unnamed source stated at the time:
“The SEC is targeting SAFTs. The new approach of the SEC is to consider tokens as both utility and security at the same time, meaning a token can bring utility to a platform but at the same time can be considered as a security if you sold it to parties that mainly looked for profit on its increase in value.”
After releasing its July 2017 DAO Report of Investigation, which introduced the crypto industry to the Howey Test, the SEC has efficiently followed a consistent pattern of enforcement, which has been laid out over the last two years, and picked off one ICO after another over the unregistered sale of securities.
In public statements, Chairman Jay Clayton has stated that the SEC believes virtually every ICO ever conducted in the United States has violated federal securities laws.
Most recently, it had been reported that a U.S. District Court authorized an emergency freeze to lock up $8 million raised in an ICO by a New York citizen alongside with two of his entities. Seemingly, the SEC claimed that Reginald Middleton, Veritaseum Inc. and Veritaseum LLC had raised the funds in an ICO that was a fraudulent, unregistered securities offering.